How Did Kim Dotcom Make His Money

Is Kim Dotcom, the "moving-picture show industry killer", guilty of organized criminal offence?

Ten years agone, you might take been looking for a solution to send your favorite songs - heavy mp3 files - with your friends. Too heavy to send by electronic mail, y'all felt frustrated. You lot didn't want to expect to meet each of your friends in person to handle over a bunch of USB sticks. You think yourself thinking that there must exist an easiest style.

Fortunately, a quick search brought you direct to what seemed to be a simple solution: Megaupload. This revolutionary website allowed you to upload files for storage in the cloud. You tried and were provided with a unique link to your files. Exactly what you needed! You could share that link to others, enabling your friends to access the files.

Problem solved. You felt great. Only what you didn't know dorsum then is that, by using Megaupload services, y'all had indirectly supported a criminal organization growing its business. How could yous have known?

By early 2012, Megaupload claimed to take over lx million registered users. It was said to be the thirteenth nigh frequently visited site on the Internet, alluring an average of 50 meg visits daily and more than than one billion visitors in total. At its meridian, Megaupload was estimated to business relationship for approximately four percent of all Cyberspace traffic worldwide

On January 20th, 2012, over 70 special tactics officers armed with attack rifles breached a mansion in Coatesville, New Zealand, and arrested four cyberspace businessmen for allegedly operating a global criminal organization. One of them was the leader of the CEO and founder of "Megaupload", quickly nicknamed by the international printing equally the picture industry killer, and commonly known as Kim Dotcom.

In January 2012, Kim Dotcom and its partners were charged past a U.s. Commune Court with criminal copyright infringement and money laundering. They were accused of using public websites to facilitate the illegal reproduction and distribution of copyrighted movies, software, television programmes, and music, causing v hundred 1000000 dollars in amercement to copyright holders and collecting hundreds of millions in turn a profit for themselves. Since then, the U.s. is seeking the extraction of Kim Dotcom to face a trial.

Multiple courts in New-Zealand take ended that at that place are grounds for allowing the extradition, only all routes of appeal accept not, as even so, been wearied. The extradition case in New Zealand has now reached the country's Supreme Court.

Of our interest is that the legal notion of "serious criminal offense" described in the United Nations Transnational Organized Crime Convention as a "crime punishable past a maximum deprivation of liberty of at to the lowest degree four years or a more serious penalty". This was widely debated during the legal proceedings in order to determine if the offence of copyright infringement is an extradition offence nether the United States/New Zealand Treaty.

How about you, dear reader? At present that you know more about Megaupload, do you think that the Kim Dotcom case qualifies as an organized criminal activity?