This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

PCFeature1

I built my first PC from scratch in the summer of 1997. I'd been upgrading diverse systems for several years earlier that, starting with an original SoundBlaster carte du jour and progressing on to retentivity and graphics upgrades (the term "GPU" literally hadn't been coined yet). Since then, I've built, upgraded, repaired, and modded more than systems than I can call up. Information technology's been a long time since I thought well-nigh how difficult the process was, though it still takes some hours to mount, tie off, and properly assemble a machine.

Over at Vice, author Emanuel Maiberg recently took on edifice a motorcar for the first fourth dimension and, while ultimately successful, didn't come away enthused about the procedure.

Beginning to end, the whole procedure of building the figurer took me almost v hours, and I had to make two emergency calls to PC Gamer's Fenlon during the procedure: once when I couldn't figure out why the case fans weren't spinning, and again when the computer didn't recognize an Ethernet cable. I was literally bleeding from a cutting on my mitt by the end of information technology, which my YouTube guides said was common…

Eventually, I got it working, and the PC is awesome…Only getting there was a nightmare. It is by far the almost difficult production I've ever bought and put together.

Maiberg notes that while the PC is clearly the best place to play games, he doesn't recollect almost people will bother, simply considering of how difficult it is to actually build a organisation. After giving the topic some consideration, I think he's really got a point.

It used to be and then much worse

I point I desire to make, which Maiberg acknowledges, is that edifice a PC actually has gotten easier over the past 20 years. I've compiled a rough list of hoops would-exist PC enthusiasts used to take to bound through in no particular order.

  • CPUs that could easily be inserted in the wrong orientation
  • Setting hardware DMAs and IRQs manually for each peripheral
  • Finding and updating drivers in the early days of the Internet
  • Manually setting CPU voltages and multipliers via DIP switches or motherboard jumpers
  • Knowing to employ two different PATA cables — one for CD, one for difficult drive

Simply by the physical installation of hardware, there's so much more than bullshit nosotros used to have to deal with that doesn't exist anymore. VIA'south 686b southbridge could cause permanent information corruption if you installed a SoundBlaster PCI card while using the onboard RAID array. Some motherboards had subconscious bug between various PCI slots that prevented them from beingness used at the same time. I once had an MSI motherboard that could only run certain memory if I installed it in the furthest slot from the CPU. RAM incompatibility was mutual, you lot had to install AGP drivers for decent graphics functioning, and fifty-fifty installing Windows required transmission intervention to load third party storage drivers much of the time. Long subsequently floppy drives were vanishing from Apple tree systems, I had to keep them handy for flashing BIOSes to support new CPUs, because the ability to read data files from USB drives wasn't something enthusiasts could take for granted.

i820chipset

The Intel i820 chipset was a debacle for the company

These issues weren't limited solely to Taiwanese chipsets, either. Intel's i820 was such a disaster the company had to remember it. The i810 lacked an AGP slot and its integrated graphics delivered a mediocre 2nd image that left fifty-fifty a loftier-end monitor looking like a thin film of grease had been smeared across the screen. The i815 follow-up added an AGP port but couldn't address more than 512MB of RAM. Enthusiasts often bought 440BX boards considering these could handle 133MHz buses through an unofficial setting, though this meant you needed an AGP card that could handle a 35% overclock. Athlon and Athlon XP cores of the twenty-four hours were easy to chip. The showtime time I bought a 32MB Radeon card, I wound upwardly having to cobble together a driver out of bits and pieces of other drivers, none of which worked individually and some of which would permanently hose a Windows 98 installation if yous attempted to uninstall them using the official ATI uninstaller.

The less said about USB ane.0, the improve — only I remember hooking up a USB mouse for the very outset time, but to discover that the mouse pointer would intermission every time the CPU was under meaning load.

Why is building a PC difficult?

Merely because things used to be a hell of a lot worse — and they really were in non-trivial means — doesn't mean they couldn't exist ameliorate than they are. Some of the problems that Maiberg raises could exist more easily communicated. The start time you lever down a ZIF socket, information technology may sound every bit if yous're doing things wrong, specially since that lever doesn't go down without some force practical.

SomeAssembly

Some assembly required

Others, like the dizzying array of available hardware, are more than hard to address. Motherboard and graphics manufacturers each carve up their production families into addressable segments, and so sell boards according to the value-added features they pack in at whatsoever given price point. This inevitably leads to customer confusion. If Intel releases 5 chipsets for Skylake and eight manufacturers release an average of 5 boards per chipset, that's 200 motherboards for ane CPU platform. Add in sockets for previous-generation parts and of a sudden you're drowning in hardware. Now multiply that times power supplies, graphics cards, CPUs, cases, RAM, and CPU coolers. Maiberg isn't wrong when he says that getting a handle on all this is a heavy elevator. 1 of the reasons why PC-build guides are often written equally general discussions rather to extreme specificity is considering there'southward no way for the writer to know which of potentially millions of combinations of hardware yous'll be attempting to gather.

One could even fence that this situation results in fewer people getting involved with PC gaming, which leads to lower amounts of revenue than would be the case if all the involved companies agreed to launch fewer products and hewed more closely to mutual standards.

A false dichotomy

There'southward one signal Maiberg makes that needs to exist called out, however.

I could have paid a site like CyberPower or Falcon Northwest for a pre-congenital PC, but buying parts of equal power from them would have price me an extra $300-$500 before taxes and shipping. Also, their websites are atrocious, and offer no assistance in picking parts. It'south just not worth it, and why PC gamers ever recommend edifice over buying in the beginning place.

That'southward why I recommend Apple products to people who aren't tech savvy. They but piece of work. When I'k pushing a water cooler downwardly on the CPU while twisting its radiator into place and screwing information technology into identify at the same fourth dimension, it becomes articulate that PCs don't just piece of work.

Information technology'due south true that Apple offers a streamlined, bonny website and a much simpler interface for production pick. I've written in the past about how awful laptop shopping is and how poorly near PC OEMs compare against Apple. But — and this is critical — when you lot buy a arrangement from Apple as opposed to building one yourself, yous're paying for the try Apple put into edifice that organisation. (Nosotros'll ignore the fact that Apple generally ignores gaming and GPU performance and tin't be bothered to apply a version of OpenGL that'south less than half-dozen years old.) Boutique builders could do a much improve task of guiding and helping would-be PC buyers pick hardware, but near all of them offer pre-congenital boxes with standard component with the option to upgrade one item detail — the GPU, for case. They also have telephone numbers, chat services, and email addresses — and companies that don't answer to customer questions don't stay in business very long. Alienware's new Aurora family unit starts with a GTX 950 at $800 and offers a GTX 1080 at $2K. That's not far off from what the writer spent.

PC gamers generally recommend buying over edifice considering information technology's the all-time fashion to optimize your cost per dollar, non because there's no other way to go — many of the desktops sold past the likes of Dell and HP can be turned into gaming rigs past adding a GPU. It can take a piffling fleck of work to check which models offer an appropriate power supply, but you don't need a 750W behemoth to run an RX 480 or GTX 970. The reason most hardware review sites also review bazaar systems is because we recognize that being a gaming enthusiast and wanting to build your own rig from scratch aren't always the aforementioned thing — and people who want to be PC gamers but don't accept fourth dimension to build desktops (or adopt a gaming laptop) deserve to know which companies are building better or worse systems.

Ultimately, I think Maiberg really makes a lot of skilful points almost how difficult information technology is to get into PC gaming and at that place may well be an unmet demand for a gaming box that solves some of the problems he ran into. I've recommended Noctua coolers in the past because the company publishes some astonishing documentation and instructions (and offers gratis lifetime hardware upgrades). PC gaming is an amazing hobby — information technology'd be to everyone's advantage if getting into it was easier.